Thursday, September 22, 2011

Bernanke: Not Responsible for the Collapse of Markets of Sept 21-22, 2011

The announcement following the FOMC meetings of September 20-21, 2011 was expected. The infrequent decision to 'Twist'- swap short-dates Treasuries against longer date securities, particularly the very long dates, was expected.

Obviously, the respective underlying intention was to promote the consumer and housing sector with inexpensive mortgage financing, and flatten those yield curves and reward tradeoffs across the Treasury spectrum.  Whether those markets react will depend on whether or not the consumer generates demand for either new homes or refinancing existing homes. In both latter cases, the intended consequence is to alleviate pressure on household debt and unlock consumer spending into the economy.

Chairman Bernanke had nothing to do with the markets' collapse world-wide.

At first, the market reacted positively to the obvious, concluding that it had already discounted the Fed's intervention for all intents and purposes. That didn't last long. Some of the more enlightened participants realized that the most important statement had been skimmed over by the markets.  Mr. Bernanke had emphasized in explicit terms the dire prediction on the global economy that was unexpected in the announcement  and, de facto, lent a deaf ear, dismissing the GOP leadership's political rhetoric of the previous day.

Chairman Bernanke,  previously informed by Secretary of the Treasury  Mr. Tim Geithner's return from the meeting of European Finance ministers in Poland last week, characterized his caution on the world economy in the following manner: 

Moreover, there are significant downside risks to the economic outlook, including strains in global financial markets. 
The markets tumbled when players realized that the global economic situation was not tepid but turbid.  Financials leading the slide, dropped across the board, catalyzed by a Moody's downgrade of Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo on their debt. The only anomaly was Hewlett Packard rallying on a rumour that their CEO had been ousted. Talk about quality trading, as if a new, yet unidentified CEO will reverse macroeconomic circumstances. The morning should reverse the ridicule and ratify the quality of its governance.

All markets in Asia and Europe tumbled overnight. The additional information from Europe and China that the Purchasing Manager's Index (PMI) is contracting, followed by market commentaries that it may suggest deterioration in manufacturing output,  is sending signals globally to investors that the only viable route is away from equities for now- a rush to safety and US Treasuries. In fact, all currencies, except USD, all commodities including gold,  and Treasuries were down or short dates unchanged with the exception of the 6mth yield rising.

But why are BRIC indexes dropping? Fundamentally, there is no structural demand within those economies that can permeate the level of manufacturing and production that has been underlying their respective growths. Until further ado, BRIC depends on Western economies and spending. Suffice it to follow the Russian equity market this day after. Significant is to realize that BRIC cannot, at this moment of their development, drive the global economy out of its slowdown. If Japan could never act as the world engine, why should BRIC assume the role. The same is true of Europe; its lame-duck behaviour is unjustified under the conditions. Europe must put its condos in order, if the investment is to be successful.

What the headlines suggest as Mr. Bernanke's Market Debacle is absolute nonsense!

The nonsense was the GOP's leadership criticism of the Federal Reserve decisions. Boehner, Cantor & Associates' understanding of basic economic realities is unreliable and incomprehensible for that level of leadership. They should simply acknowledge that without employment there is no spending and there are no sources of Treasury revenue; and without revenue sources, there is no deficit reduction. If they persist on professing that deficit myth: that deficits matter for the US economy, they will make matters worse. They should recognize their own shortage of viable solutions, and grasp the moment to support fiscal spending programs. As for Rating Agency downgrades, they don't  matter at this moment.  Recently, they have been shrugged off by all sovereign levels.

Unless the US economy is activated, and this won't happen as a result of Federal Reserve monetary policy, the global economy will remain in a state of stagnation for a long time. It is obvious that any solution must come out of Washington. A reasonable start is to couple that  result from flattening long date yields with an aggressive mortgage refinancing program for the suffering homeowners and well-intentioned consumers.

4 comments:

  1. Nice Twist! The deontological problem is raised because the investment community needs a usual suspect when things go as usually as they do when the market blows itself up. It happened with Volcker and now with Bernanke. Of course, it never happened with Greenspan (lol)

    ReplyDelete
  2. gritty! you may get some consolation with the Fed but you're getting condolences from the market. boehner, cantor & associates is more appropriate than perry & co, for washington, not for texas.
    3 nods: on BRIC, on HP and on the FOMC defence.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good read CI. Just a caution. Sometimes, Fed interventions may appear to substitute normal Treasury initiatives, and to some market pundits, it may appear as undermining Treasury. However, just to remind everyone that the Fed would know that better than anyone else, so any comment in that regard is actually begging the question, by someone who has no sense of subtleties. Who said 'If someone else is doing your job, either you're not needed or he's telling you to do something else' Swells (lol) In the case of Geithner, I don't think it's the former. Ideas CI?

    ReplyDelete
  4. To JH Craw. Thank you. If I get some consolation from the Fed and acknowledgement from my readers, I am a fortunate man. Your pun by juxtaposing 'boehner...' and 'perry...' is outstandingly (lol) creative. Thanks for the insight (nod!)and the Twist!! (nod Manfredo!)
    To Manfredo. I get most of my ideas as takes from the FRB (Fictional Reserve Barking)Circuit's crafty columns and the comments of its readers. I await for those timely commentaries by the Group of Five or Six-not quite certain how many...but the blend of history and economics makes the reading a luxury worth waiting for. So thank you.
    To swells (nod!) Your maxim ( 'If someone else is doing your job, either you're not needed or he's telling you to do something else') is appreciated. You are absolutely correct that the Fed knew what it was doing, and it didn't do it for market insiders nor for government pundits, but because its mandate is clear. On the other hand, it is also true that the Fed could have abstained from doing anything, and give Treasury the initiative. However, I consider that the flattening yield curve effect is a positive indicator to markets and investors, that the rewards are better in the equity market with good dividend profiles than in other options, and these rewards are intended as longer-lasting than one would assume. Thus a fait accompli that should depict the monetary policy background to enable investment strategists churn the product properly.
    Whether there are any takers? well some players were back in the financials on Friday, so the overnight reflection may have paid off.
    Your suggestion that Geithner may have enough on his plate for now is very possible. I think Treasury has political issues re the budget and governance issues re US banks on Europe and European subs in the US that demarcate Treasury's willingness to do anything now.

    ReplyDelete